The government announced NBN2 and the globe kept spinning; nothing new to see here. However we (as in Australia) got a regulatory review and that was probably a good outcome. As I’ve been half following the NBN in the news I’m finding some of the review findings/submissions interesting. However there are some things that just make me want to go into cryogenic stasis – I might see something change that way.

To think that this is even a source of contention is rediculous. The practical requirement, in my opinion, of getting HIGH speed internet(s) is Fiber to the x, FTTN being the most likely for a first build out, which means optical fiber needs to be run to every pit of every exchange. (NB. I refuse to use the word broadband as it is really a description of relative technologies; not a service).

The risks of having hanging cables are many. Downtime from damage is a biggie. But that is entirely irrelevent. Pits can flood shorting out the copper circuits; someone can dig before dialing; etc… and security wise: it’s not like the current copper network is at all protected from someone who knows how to patch a copper pair – having said that optical fiber splicing is arguably harder so that’s a plus for “back to the exchange”.

None of those risks qualify my statement of rediculous though.

We have perfectly functional cabling conduit and other accesses for rolling out FTTN. The position should be they will be used. To all the people involved: Get over the bureaucracy and get something done for once. Conroy/DBCDE: buy back the wholesale stuff from Telstra – that’s the governments penalty for not seperating during the privatisation; Telstra shareholders: set a price for the buy out – consider it a forced buy out or unfriendly takeover if you will but take a spoon of toughen up: other countries privatisation arrangements seperated wholesale and retail from the outset; Telstra was a bubble that is now going to either burst or be popped; and that writing was on the wall from day one.

In summary: there shouldn’t be an option. It’s rediculous.

Hi All,

The AFP is reporting on a new book by Stephen Hawking. The basic premise is to make real-science equally exciting as science-fiction. Having recently taken out a New Scientist subscription I can’t argue with the reasoning: It would be really good if people took more interested in the “coolness” of science and other geeky/nerdy stuff. Of course coolness might be subjective to the reader in this case.

In other news GWB is in the country. Thats all I have to say about that.

(Wow I love Firefox – I accidentally Ctrl+W’d this tab – closes the tab – without saving this post; using the “Recently Closed Tabs” menu I got it all back without any work).

In Matthew 18:20 we read about the presence of Christ where 2 or 3 are gathered in His name. We gather regularly for meetings, fellowship and sometimes just socializing. We all have our reasons and motivations – but we should be gathering in His name.

Thats my thoughts for this morning the 5th of September.