AndyB

The government announced NBN2 and the globe kept spinning; nothing new to see here. However we (as in Australia) got a regulatory review and that was probably a good outcome. As I’ve been half following the NBN in the news I’m finding some of the review findings/submissions interesting. However there are some things that just make me want to go into cryogenic stasis – I might see something change that way.

To think that this is even a source of contention is rediculous. The practical requirement, in my opinion, of getting HIGH speed internet(s) is Fiber to the x, FTTN being the most likely for a first build out, which means optical fiber needs to be run to every pit of every exchange. (NB. I refuse to use the word broadband as it is really a description of relative technologies; not a service).

The risks of having hanging cables are many. Downtime from damage is a biggie. But that is entirely irrelevent. Pits can flood shorting out the copper circuits; someone can dig before dialing; etc… and security wise: it’s not like the current copper network is at all protected from someone who knows how to patch a copper pair – having said that optical fiber splicing is arguably harder so that’s a plus for “back to the exchange”.

None of those risks qualify my statement of rediculous though.

We have perfectly functional cabling conduit and other accesses for rolling out FTTN. The position should be they will be used. To all the people involved: Get over the bureaucracy and get something done for once. Conroy/DBCDE: buy back the wholesale stuff from Telstra – that’s the governments penalty for not seperating during the privatisation; Telstra shareholders: set a price for the buy out – consider it a forced buy out or unfriendly takeover if you will but take a spoon of toughen up: other countries privatisation arrangements seperated wholesale and retail from the outset; Telstra was a bubble that is now going to either burst or be popped; and that writing was on the wall from day one.

In summary: there shouldn’t be an option. It’s rediculous.

In The News dbcde, internet, nbn, networking, telstra

The Australian government should buy back Telstra’s wholesale and infrastructure. At a cost amicable to the shareholders but, as is the case with stock risk, for no more than what the current market would expect.

That’s it. That’s my idea.

If you want a reason go lookup the NBN project; Telstra’s opposition to it; ACC investigations into monopolising and then some; current Telstra share price; comparative international service cost differences; etc… in other words there are many reasons.

Oh I’d love to be there when someone introduced this as a bill to parliament.

Everyday Life politics, telstra

As mentioned before in Next G over LAN my phone line has a high signal attenuation, too high for me to get ADSL. Essentially this means there is too much copper cable between the exchange and my house. I need some form of broadband at home so I turned to wireless. The 3G HSDPA networks provide the speed I need, and the UTMS 850Mhz network from Telstra (i.e. Next G) has coverage for where I live. So I’m using Next G for home internet.

Recently there have been several questions how I got this working. This post goes through the steps in more detail. In fact I reinstalled SmoothWall myself last night to upgrade to the official version 3.0 release so I wrote this as I went.

UPDATE JUNE 2009: See comments about using the “Option Driver” instead of Airprime – Airprime is, since 2.6.27, deprecated. The Option Driver does not require patching. Read more…

Everyday Life bigpond, howto, linux, nat, NextG, smoothwall, telstra